Monday, January 14, 2013

Aging Gracefully, or the Tao of Vince


Recently, 35-year old Dallas Mavericks forward Vince Carter had a bit of a throwback night against the Washington Wizards.  The former Slam Dunk Champion threw down a couple of nice dunks in that game which were reminiscent of his more dominant years as a young man with the Toronto Raptors.  Of course, the older Vince we know today is a much different (and less awe-inspiring) player, so his performance in that game understandably drew some attention.  So much so that a blog post entitled “Vince Carter shocks everyone with multi-dunk game in 2013” surfaced on The Score.  Of course, the most remarkable thing about all the hubbub surrounding those dunks is just how pedestrian they are compared to the ones Carter routinely converted in his days with Toronto and New Jersey (remember this? Or this?). 

That sudden realization of the decline of Vince Carter saddened me just a bit.  Carter has (deservedly) received a fair bit of criticism throughout his career for being soft, unmotivated, or faking injuries.  But despite all that there’s no doubt that, for individuals of a certain generation, Carter was the biggest star we grew up idolizing, and the one we all tried to emulate on the playground or at school.  Now, less than a decade later, Carter is little more than a role player for the struggling Mavericks; a player for whom two fairly standard-looking dunks in a single basketball game is cause for celebration.  How far the mighty have fallen. 

All this of this is particularly notable given the circumstances of this 2012-2013 NBA season.  While Vince plays a bit role for a fringe playoff team in Dallas, Kobe Bryant and Tim Duncan, two fellow veterans who were actually drafted in the years BEFORE him, are enjoying their finest seasons in ages.  Tim Duncan’s Player Efficiency Rating of 24.3 is his highest since 2009, and Kobe has hasn’t had a PER this high (24.7) since 2006.  And those two players have racked up many more minutes of playing time, including postseason play, over their careers than Vince.

So why has Vince declined so rapidly since his “superstar” days in Toronto?  The Vince critic would no doubt argue that his decline is a result of the lack of remarkable work ethic that typifies surefire Hall of Famers like Bryant and Duncan.  And that critic wouldn’t be totally incorrect.  Vince hasn’t been the most willing hard worker throughout his career.  But in fact, few players do have the work ethic of a Duncan or a Bryant, or of modern-day superstars like LeBron James and Kevin Durant.  The question is why we held Vince up to those impossible standards in the first place, given that he never did himself.

Vince was an athlete and a marvel, not unlike a JR Smith of today.  He has always been a solid shooter, but never possessed a truly elite skill outside of his unreal leaping ability.  Whether in the realm of passing or defense, Carter has vacillated between terrible and average throughout his career.  And for those reasons, the reality is that Vince never truly fit the mold of a “superstar”, even in his earlier days in Toronto.  And yet years of trying to play up to that role foisted upon him by media and fans exhausted him, and led to his disastrous final days as a Raptor.  Of course, I’m not making excuses for what Vince did in Toronto (demanding trades, not playing his hardest, feigning injuries).   
Raptors fans in particular have every right to be angry at him.  But he was young.  And in hindsight, his behavior at the time seems like small potatoes next to the recent antics of players like Carmelo Anthony or Dwight Howard.  After all, Vince never got a coach fired, or held a press conference to announce his loyalty while simultaneously plotting his exit to another team.

Unsurprisingly, when Vince arrived in New Jersey, he immediately settled into the role of second fiddle to Jason Kidd.  And thus began his seamless transition into the role player we know today.  On the surface, it seems like a sad end to a career that was destined for so much more.  But in this case, those who are able to focus less on the perceived “potential” of Vince and more on the actual facts of his career may be surprised what they see. 

Last month, Zach Lowe wrote a fantastic article for Grantland in which he (seriously) made a case for Vince Carter as a Hall of Fame player.  And the fact is, looking strictly at the stats, Vince is a strong candidate.  Lowe makes the case for Vince like this:

“(Vince Carter will) at least approach 22,000 career points this season, and with a guaranteed deal for next season, he has a shot to reach 23,000 if he stays healthy. Only 13 players in NBA/ABA history have eclipsed 22,000 points, 5,000 rebounds, and 4,000 assists; Carter, Ray Allen, and Paul Pierce will make it 16 shortly, and a few others — Clyde Drexler, Gary Payton, Larry Bird — barely missed.”

So in that context, Vince Carter, the career disappointment, has a borderline Hall of Fame caliber career. He also can make an argument that for a period of three to four years in the early 2000s, he was the most popular basketball player on the face of the planet.  Not too bad.  But as I reflected more and more on the career of Vince Carter, the thing that impressed me the most about him is how at ease he seems to be with his legacy and career.  Carter has often been decried as soft or accused of simply not caring.  But his actions mostly strike me as those of a man who simply lacks the maniacal devotion to the sport of basketball that many (for some reason) expect him to have.

In 2001, Carter attended his graduation on the morning of a decisive Game 7 against the Philadelphia 76ers that his team eventually lost.  Mind you, Carter didn’t miss the game itself, and his decision may have had no actual effect on the result of the game.  Yet he was crucified for his actions by Raptors fans.   Later in his Raptors career, Carter, who is famously close with his mother, was criticized again when his mother had the audacity to defend her son in speaking out against the Raptors organization and then-Coach Sam Mitchell. 

Long story short, Vince was villainized by Toronto fans in part for his dedication to such trifling issues as education and family instead of basketball.  To basketball fans, Vince may be one of the greatest examples of squandered talent in NBA history.  But visit his website and you’ll find a list a mile long of his charitable exploits, as well as directions to his successful restaurant in Dayton, Florida.  All in all, it seems like Vince is doing just fine without the approval of all the fans that get off on calling him overrated or badmouthing him in the comments section of YouTube videos.

In researching the career of Vince Carter, there is one quote of his in particular that intrigued me: "Being overlooked, it doesn't hurt my feelings, it doesn't bother me…It just makes my job easier, really. Just go out there and be who I am."  Obviously, Kobe Bryant would never be caught dead uttering those words and even if he did, we would all recognize them as lies.  The legends of the game, Kobe, Michael and their ilk, are fueled endlessly by every perceived slight.  

Vince, by contrast, is a player who has found comfort in the shadows.  He once stood at the precipice of superstardom and, obviously, found himself wanting.  Now he knows better than anyone that he is no Kobe Bryant, despite how much fans tried to force him to think otherwise.  And unlike players like Tracy McGrady or Allen Iverson, he wasn’t interested in driving himself out of the league by grasping at any delusions of being such a player.

In these, his waning years, Carter has not grumbled about his minutes or fled to China in the interest of feeding his ego or self-perception as a megawatt star.  Instead, he has gracefully made the transformation into a role player and mentor for younger teammates.  Into a player who has drawn nothing but praise from both his teammates and coaches.  By all appearances, Vince Carter is very pleased with the way his career turned out.  I suppose then that the next, most pressing question is: should we be? 




No comments: