Today, the NBA released the most recent results of the fan
voting for the 2013 All-Star Game to be held in Houston, Texas. As with past years, there wasn’t a whole lot
to be surprised about. The fact that
34-year-old Kobe Bryant led the voting caused a bit of a stir. But the rest of the top four was hardly
gasp-inducing: along with Kobe, fellow
superstars LeBron James, Kevin Durant, and Carmelo Anthony lead the way. Perennial All-Star Dwyane Wade is another top
vote-getter. But there is actually somewhat
of a brewing controversy hidden in the results, and it centers around the category
of the Western Conference backcourt. The
top two names are familiar ones: Bryant and Los Angeles Clippers point guard
Chris Paul. But who is that lurking a
scant less than fifty-thousand votes behind Paul? None other than Mr. Linsanity himself, Jeremy
Lin of the hometown Houston Rockets.
Those who last paid attention to the NBA in the winter of
2012 when Linsanity ruled the Earth may not be surprised to see Lin’s name
placed among the Western Conference elite guards. After all, the Lin of that era was dropping
thirty-eight points against Bryant and the Lakers in Madison Square Garden, and
nailing incredible buzzer
beaters while making the game look easy.
Unfortunately, the Lin of 2013 is an entirely different animal. Granted, the young point guard and his new
Rockets teammates have managed to pull things together as of late: they’ve won
nine of their last twelve, and outscored opponents by an impressive seventeen
points a game during a recent five-game winning streak. But on an individual basis, Lin’s numbers aren’t
great: his Player Efficiency Rating is a
career-low 14.5 and his Win Shares per 48 Minutes is only .083, down from
career high of .140 last year.
By contrast, the man currently barely ahead of Lin in the
All-Star voting, future Hall-of-Famer Chris Paul, boasts a sterling Win Shares
per 48 Minutes of .287 and the fourth-best PER rating in the league at
25.8. He also recently led the Clippers
to a league wide season-high seventeen-game winning streak, and is being
mentioned as a potential MVP candidate. Looking
at both numbers and reputation, Chris Paul would seem to be a clear cut choice
as an All-Star over Lin. So why has it
been such a close race? And does it even matter?
The answer to the first question is the same reason that Lin
became such a phenomenon last year: a combination of a great underdog story and
global appeal. Last year, the world fell
in love with Lin because of his unlikely story: an Asian-American player in a
league utterly devoid of them, undrafted and eventually signed and discarded by
his hometown team, only to eventually find success on the greatest stage in all
of basketball. A Hollywood executive couldn’t have dreamed up a better
plot. It didn’t hurt that the Ivy
League-educated Lin came off as so humble and unassuming. It was hard not to fall in love with
him. But while audiences stateside were
falling in love with Lin, an overwhelming number of fans internationally were,
too. And therein lays the true strength
of the surprising All-Star movement for Mr. Lin.
At the height of Linsanity last year, much was made of the
worldwide appeal of Lin (whose parents are of Taiwanese origin). But it may surprise some people just how
widespread (though admittedly short-lived) that appeal was. Around this time last year, Lin had the top-selling
jersey in the entire NBA. During
Linsanity, the CCTV network in China saw viewership increase 39 percent, and
NBA.com/China had 43 percent more page views compared to the previous
season. Last year, Lin did not make the
All-Star Game, but was hastily added by the NBA to the Rising
Stars Challenge
game by the NBA. The results were evident:
Around 2.8 million people watched
the event on TNT, the highest number since the 2004 game featuring LeBron
James, Dwyane Wade, and Carmelo Anthony.
In fact, the 2012 game featuring Lin saw a viewership increase of about
27% over that star-studded 2004 matchup.
Obviously, Lin has an incredible amount of supporters both
in the U.S. and abroad, particularly China.
In 2013, Lin is not only benefiting from the hometown vote, but new voting
policies instituted by the NBA that have made it easier than ever before
for international fans to vote. They can
cast their ballot on Twitter and Facebook, and on Chinese social media websites
like Sina Weibo and Tencent QQ. This is
obviously a well-thought-out decision by the NBA: globalization of the game has
long been a pet project of Commissioner David Stern. Last year’s All-Star Game was broadcast in
215 countries and territories in 47 languages, and was covered by 1,800
media, including 336 international reporters.
So even if Lin does make the All-Star
Game over Paul or another arguably more deserving player, you won’t hear Stern
or the NBA complaining: they can probably already hear the sounds of cash
registers working overtime at the league offices. Fans, though, tend to be less concerned about
the bottom line, and for many of them the idea of Lin making the roster over a
superior player is a travesty. One blogger
goes so far as to suggest that, if Lin attains a starting spot in the All-Star
Game, fan voting should no longer determine the starters.
Unfortunately, fans like that blogger
and others who sour at the thought of Jeremy Lin starting for the Western
Conference All-Stars have lost sight of the objective of the All-Star
Game. It isn’t to reward the best
players. It never has been. Did Allen Iverson deserve to start every year
he was voted into the game past his prime? Or Yao Ming, who, similar to Lin,
received a “bump” in voting each year from his fans in China? The purpose of
the All-Star Game is to reward the players who the fans most want to see. And, in that regard, the votes of fans in
China and other countries should count just as much as those of us in the
United States. Our game has truly gone
global, and the popularity of Jeremy Lin is one testament to that. We should welcome his success.
In any event, even if Lin gets more
votes than Paul, the coaches will select Paul as a substitute. Sure, in that scenario, some potentially
worthy West guard like James Harden or Russell Westbrook will be out in the
cold as a result, but that’s kind of the point.
It’s an All-Star Game. That means
not everybody gets to play in it. And at
the end of the year, some combination of Paul, Harden, or Westbrook will be
voted to an All-NBA Team by the media and Lin will be nowhere to be found. There’s nothing wrong with that system.
“Real” NBA fans like to complain about the
All-Star Game; how meaningless it is because the players don’t take it
seriously or because there’s no defense.
Yet many of those some fans will debate endlessly about which players deserve
to make the cut, and who was snubbed after the fact. Then the day after the game, like clockwork,
the entire affair is forgotten. Think
about it. How many specific All-Star
Games or moments do you actually remember? I’m willing to bet less than a
handful. When we discuss the careers of
great players like Michael Jordan, we always mention the MVP awards, or the
championships. But who remembers how
many All-Star Games a player made? Kevin McHale made seven All-Star teams in
his career. Vince Carter made eight. Would anyone argue that Vince Carter had a
better career than 3-time NBA Champion McHale? Of course not.
The NBA All-Star game is little more
than a spectacle; a midseason distraction and opportunity to give players a
much-needed rest. Jeremy Lin is a young,
exciting athlete whose style of play is well-suited to the All-Star Game. Veterans like Tim Duncan are practically begging
to be left out of the festivities while, for a young player like Lin, making
the team would likely be the culmination of a lifetime dream. Fans who would deny him that opportunity, and
his supporters the chance to see him play, are just being asinine.
No comments:
Post a Comment